122 records exist in the repository. All are in review or otherwise visible in preview mode.
Library signal / live from the build
The state ofthe reference.
Counts, coverage and gaps from this build. The dashboard reports what is actually in the repository, including the things that are not ready. It does not estimate quality, accuracy or approval.
As-of 5 November 2026Content mode: preview
Publication gate
0 / 100published terms. The PRD launch threshold is not met. This is an editorial preview, not a release candidate for public content.
Read the publication policyAt a glance
Six numbers, no gloss.
Named-person reviewer coverage is 0%.
72 records in the central source registry.
Per visible term. More links do not automatically mean better evidence.
Term-level notes across 8 region codes.
Packs with any review state beyond draft. All nine currently remain draft.
Coverage
Where the library is thick and thin.
The distribution below reflects the visible library. It is a coverage signal, not a quality score.
Terms by field and level
Each bar shows total terms. Colour segments show foundation, practitioner and advanced.
FoundationPractitionerAdvanced
| Field | Foundation | Practitioner | Advanced | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sourcing | 6 | 12 | 2 | 20 |
| Strategy | 3 | 10 | 2 | 15 |
| Risk | 7 | 9 | 1 | 17 |
| Sustainability & Digital | 0 | 9 | 3 | 12 |
| Contracts | 7 | 7 | 10 | 24 |
| Finance | 1 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| Operations | 6 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Suppliers | 2 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
Level mix
How the visible library splits by depth.
122terms
- Foundation32
- Practitioner68
- Advanced22
Regional note coverage
Terms with a separate note for each code.
Zero is a real result. It means no term-level note exists for that code in this build, not that no local rule exists.
Evidence
The source trail.
Source types used by terms
Counts of unique registry records referenced by at least one term.
Content status
Every record in the repository, not just visible terms.
- in review122
- reviewed0
- published0
- draft0
- expired0
- retired0
Draft and in-review records are visible only because this is an editorial preview. A published-only build would show 0 terms.
Region pack matrix
The content pack status, not term-note status.
- GlobaldraftNo reviewer
GLOBAL - IndiadraftNo reviewer
IN - United StatesdraftNo reviewer
US - CaliforniadraftNo reviewer
US-CA - United KingdomdraftNo reviewer
GB - EnglanddraftNo reviewer
GB-ENG - WalesdraftNo reviewer
GB-WLS - ScotlanddraftNo reviewer
GB-SCT - Northern IrelanddraftNo reviewer
GB-NIR
The UK stays at nation level. The umbrella GB selector shows nation notes and asks for a nation choice rather than inventing one UK rule.
Read the numbers correctly
What this dashboard cannot tell you.
It does not score factual accuracy.
A term can have four sources and still contain a bad reading. Accuracy needs editorial and, where relevant, regional or legal review.
It does not prove review happened.
Only a named reviewer, role and date count. Prepared dates and source check dates are not reviewer sign-off.
It does not prove legal coverage.
A regional note covers one scope. It is not a complete statement of law, regulator practice or professional standard for every authority.
It does not measure usage.
There is no analytics or telemetry. This build cannot know which terms people find useful or where they get stuck.
Data is generated from the same validated term and region files that render the pages. Last prepared date: 2026-11-05.
Review coverage: 0%. See the human gates that remain blocked.